Newsgroup: comp.lang.c++
Subject: String class and the use of char*/const char*
From: goran.pusic@...
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
we seem to be having a style issue in the team.
We have a string class that has char* and const char* conversion operators
(yes, i know we should be using std::string, please bear with me).
Some people in the team prefer that, when calling code like this:
retval func(..., const char* param, ...);
with an instance of our string class, we use an explicit cast, e.g.
mystring s(whatever);
func(..., (const char*)s, ...);
(as opposed to not using a cast).
Can I please have your opinion on this (good/bad/like/not like)? Insight?
(My purpose, obviously, is to show your responses to the team).
TIA,
Goran.
Subject: String class and the use of char*/const char*
From: goran.pusic@...
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
we seem to be having a style issue in the team.
We have a string class that has char* and const char* conversion operators
(yes, i know we should be using std::string, please bear with me).
Some people in the team prefer that, when calling code like this:
retval func(..., const char* param, ...);
with an instance of our string class, we use an explicit cast, e.g.
mystring s(whatever);
func(..., (const char*)s, ...);
(as opposed to not using a cast).
Can I please have your opinion on this (good/bad/like/not like)? Insight?
(My purpose, obviously, is to show your responses to the team).
TIA,
Goran.
via Usenet Forums - Usenet Search,Free Usenet - comp.lang.c++ http://www.pocketbinaries.com/usenet-forums/showthread.php?113796-String-class-and-the-use-of-char*-const-char*&goto=newpost
View all the progranning help forums at:
http://www.pocketbinaries.com/usenet-forums/forumdisplay.php?128-Coding-forums
No comments:
Post a Comment